Saturday, August 9, 2014

Veteran Minnesota Tax Credit

TAX CREDIT, TAX CREDIT For Military Service!

You may already know about this benefit, I just learned about it and thought there may be others like me that did not have the information. The 2008 omnibus tax bill in Minnesota (Laws 2008, ch. 366) provides for an income tax credit for past military service. It is a $750.00 credit. A credit is a deduction dollar for dollar against income tax owed. The credit took effect in tax year 2009 for returns filed in 2010. Eligible filers can sue form M-1C to claim the credit.

So who is an eligible filer?

To qualify for the credit, a veteran must:

•have served in the military (this includes the National Guard and Reserves)for at least 20 years;
•have a service-connected disability rated by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) as being 100 percent total and permanent; or
•be eligible for military retirement pay.

A veteran must have at least $750.00 of state income tax liability to receive full credit amount. A veteran with less than $750.00 in income tax liability is eligible for a credit up to the amount of the tax. What this means for example- In tax year 2014, a single veteran without dependents with the standard deduction, would need to have earned $24,069.00 (Federal Adjusted Gross Income) to receive the full credit.

Unfortunately, the credit is not available to high income earning veterans. The military service credit is phased out for veteran with Federal Adjusted Gross Income (FAGI) of $30,000.00 or more. When $30,000.00 of income is reached, the credit is reduced by 10 percent in excess of $30,000.00. When income (FAGI)is over $37,500.00 there is no longer a credit available to take.

Social Security benefits are not included in FAGI, so receipt of benefits will not subject an individual to the income based phaseout. However, if a veteran has no taxable income or income over $37,500.00 there is not tax credit.





Tuesday, August 5, 2014

Expedited Veterans Disability Process



Previously I had written about how social security treats VA disability ratings when a disabled servicemember attempts to obtain disability benefits.

Although there is no increase in the weight given to a VA disability rating, there is a new expedited Veterans disability process. 

If you are a veteran with a 100% disability rating from the VA, you have a new process that under which Social Security will treat your application as high priority and issue an expedited decision.

To receive expedited treatment, you must prove, with a VA notification letter,  that you have a 100% rating.  That with your application for Social Security disability benefits begins the process.

Unfortunately, Social Security only expedites the process, it give no additional weight to the fact you have a 100% rating from the VA, and it does not represent, in any manner, that you will be approved for benefits.

Social Security emphasizes that even with a 100% VA rating, you must still meet the strict eligibility requirements for a disability finding.

From a public relations standpoint such an program sounds great, but without additional weight given to the VA rating in the Social Security arena in most cases it will just allow a quicker receipt of a denial.
Most veterans coming out of the service with a disability are young and although disabled, social security’s disability program is designed for applicant’s over 50 years of age.  Although I have had some success in obtain benefits for younger individual, it is very difficult.  The best thing that could happen , for the disabled veteran, would be adopting of a regulation that requires Social Security to give significant weight to the 100% VA rating.

For more information – go to http://ssa.gov

Since writing this blog, I have spoken with several veterans trying to obtain social security benefits.  They have misconstrued the expedited process thinking it assures benefits to a veteran with a 100% disability rating.  After explaining that all the process does is allow a earlier look see, there has been a lot of anger displayed.  Unless their disability meets/equals a listed impairment, they most likely will receive a denial.  Most of the Veterans are young, and a younger individual has a tough time obtaining benefits.  Explaining all of this, they feel that the process really is of no benefit to them.  

In many cases, those suffering PTSD, will need a hearing before an administrative law judge to have a real chance at benefits, just because of the need to prove how disabling the PTSD

Wednesday, July 23, 2014

GI Bill and Equality of Education

It is apparently very, very hard is not impossible task for Congress to change the GI Bill to help insure that veterans get a good education for the money paid.  Unfortunately a lot of private universities/colleges are more concerned about putting the GI bill money in their pocket and provide a substandard eduction to the vet.  Many of the school are not even accredited.

The private colleges and universities have lobbyists who have been very effective in protecting the interests of the schools over those of the vet.  Millions of dollars flow from the vets GI Bill education benefits to these schools.  It is a big deal.  The graduation rate is terrible and the private school refuse to disclose the graduate rate, employment rate i.e. information showing that they provide a benefit for their services.

Congressmen who appear to love money more then the vets have stepped in time and time again to stop changes to the GI Bill that would benefit the vet. These are veteran who depended upon their representative fair governess in this area.

For example  representative JOHN KLINE, from Minnesota has accepted $48,000.00 from an agency that lobbies for the private schools.  Does it affect his actions in Congress?  Apparently, YES,--recently killed a attempt to make changes to the GI Bill that would put some limits on the money paid to these private institutions, making some linkage to success of the veterans and the education provided.  Sounded reasonable?

The men and women who served and served honorably deserve better than this from their representatives.  I would have trouble sleeping at night trying to justify accepting money for my benefit knowing it goes to perpetuate protection for the schools financial interests over the interest of the vets.

This is just and opinion by someone upset over another new report of bad happenings effecting vets.

Friday, May 16, 2014

POST TRAUMATIC STRESS, THE WAR VETERAN AND SOCIAL SECURITY

POST TRAUMATIC STRESS, THE WAR VETERAN AND SOCIAL SECURITY

You have served your country fighting in a foreign war. You have returned home and you notice something is wrong. You are having nightmares. You have trouble concentrating. Sudden loud noises make you duck for cover. You have trouble functioning on a day-to-day basis. You very likely suffer from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).
Many people suffering a traumatic injury due to such things as assault, murder, rape, death of a friend or other traumatic event have been found to suffer the effects of PTSD. One of the worst inflicters of traumatic injury is war. A soldier can be exposed to seeing first hand horrendous death or mutilation caused by today's weapons of war. Battles and IUD's can take a close friend's life, and the soldier can be exposed to the relentless fear of death on each mission.
The statistics are alarming. Over 40 percent of the 1.6 million veterans from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are now seeking compensation for injuries. Most, if not all, claim the injuries to be service-related . Further, for the first time in modern history Reserves and National Guard have been called up and carried a large burden of the war.
Women also served in greater numbers in these wars, and are accounting for a larger percentage of claims.
The new munitions used in the war, body armor and very improved battlefield and immediately associated care have allowed more service members to survive from wounds that would have been fatal in prior wars. This has resulted in higher numbers of service members suffering new injuries.
The Social Security Administration has a program that gives service members an ability to receive expedited processing of disability claims. If you are a veteran or active duty service member and you become disabled while on active duty (anytime after September 2001), you are eligible to get an expedited decision in your Social Security disability case. It does not matter where or how you became disabled. In processing your claim, Social Security will not consider where or how the disability happened. Your disability does not need to be related to your military duty, it just needs to have occurred while you were on active duty.
What to do to apply?
First, you must let the Social Security Administration know that your medical condition began while you were on active duty. Secondly, you must identify the location where your military records are kept. Do not rely upon the Department of Defense which will routinely send the names of ill or injured service members. Many times these reports may be incomplete. Remember when you file for disability with Social Security you must make sure that you provide the proof that you are, or were, a service member.
If reported correctly, your application will be marked as a Military Casualty/Wounded Warrior (MC/WW) file and expedited through all stages of the disability decision process as a critical case. (If you have filed for benefits with the VA, that will not automatically be an application for Social Security disability benefits. Social Security will require a separate application).
Evidence that will help in your application include:
Original or certified copy of your birth certificate or proof of U.S. citizenship or legal residency if foreign born;
Form DD 214, if discharged from military service;
Proof of military pay;
Medical records that you have or that you can easily obtain from all military and civilian sources
The fact that your case will receive expedited treatment does not lesson your burden to prove that your disability or disabilities are so severe that they prevent you from working competitively employed in any job within your functional capacity. There are no provisions in the law that make a wounded warrior's burden of proof less then anyone else applying for disability benefits. Further, by the way the system is structured, if you are under 50 years of age, your burden to obtain benefits is just that much more difficult. If you have read my blog entry on how Social Security treats a disability rating from the VA, you can see that being disabled for VA does not automatically qualify you for social security disability benefits. Social Security requires additional proof of inability to be competitively employed.
If you are in this situation and believe that you are unable to work because of a disability, you need an attorney on your side to advocate your position.
Disclaimer: Blogs posted herein are intended neither as legal advice, nor do they create nor attempt to create an attorney-client relationship. The person viewing my blogs is admonished that an attorney-client relationship may only be created with the express consent to the parties to it.

Thursday, May 8, 2014

TRUST VETS



Having served during the time period in which we where embroiled in Vietnam, I had a different experience than what servicemembers  see today.

I make that comment because I have recently become associated with ‘Trust Vets’ ‘Friend of Veterans’.  Soldiers, active, inactive, reserve or guard, past, present or future, are people who involuntarily or voluntarily put aside part of their life for their country.  Since the death of the draft, the services have been filled from the ranks of  volunteers.  All those who have served in any capacity, have a common heritage, service to our country and to others.

I think it is tremendous to see an organization, like ‘Trust Vets’  provide  a common nexus, that provides servicemembers an ability to help each other, and to work with others who have a common ‘service’ connection.

If you are curious or interested take a look at its web site – www.trustvets.com

Sunday, August 11, 2013

The Service member must agree to a division of the Survivor Benefit Plan in a Divorce to make the division legal???

I recently had a JAG major tell me that I was completely wrong in indicating that a servicemember's wife involved a divorce could obtain a division of the servicemember's Survivor Benefit Plan.  That the SBP is divisable by the Court in a divorce, whether or not the servicemember agreed.

I was told that the U.S. Supreme Court has so ruled.

I can find no change in the regulations/CFRs or any U.S.Supreme Court decision of recent vintage making such a holding.

It appears that on reconsideration the position has changed.  The current objection was that the request was not made until after the divorce.  The divorce did not give the wife a right, and after the divorce, the wife has become a former spouse.

So what it is is an interpretation of what the divorce gave each party.  In any case, there is only a time period of one year, post decree, to make the division.

Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Division of Military Retired Pay

Changes in benefits that a servicemember could receive upon qualifying for retirement from the military service, make a revisit of provisions for division of retired pay imperative.  The issue always arises in a dissolution proceedings.

This is a work in process, and not offered as legal advise or opinion.  If this is an issue affecting you, you need to retain legal counsel and relie upon your attorney's advise in this legal matter.

On my proposed draft, I WOULD APPRECIATE COMMENTS, CHANGES QUESTIONS, setting forth what should be put into or removed from this division of military pay.

My proposed draft:



STATE OF MINNESOTA                                                                DISTRICT COURT
COUNTY OF                                                                         JUDICIAL DISTRICT
                                                                                            FAMILY COURT DIVISION
------------------------------------------------------------       Court File No.
In Re the Marriage of:

,

                                    Petitioner,                        ORDER DIVIDING PETITIONER’S
                                                                                             MILITARY RETIRED PAY
And                                                                                         (Active Duty)
,

                                      Respondent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

            This Order is issued pursuant to paragraph __ of the parties dissolution decree which was signed by the Honorable ____________ on _______________.  The Order is issued to divide the military retired pay of Petitioner,
*
SSN:  On the attached confidential information form.

and direct for the payment of a portion of such retired pay to
Respondent,
*
SSN:  On the attached confidential information form.

as more fully described herein. 
1.         The Petitioner's military retired pay constitutes marital property to the extent that it is based on active duty service performed between ______________ date of marriage at the same time of which Respondent was on active duty with the United States __________ and _________, 200_ (the date Respondent retired from active duty service or date of dissolution if still serving).
            The Respondent shall be entitled to receive as her share a percentage of the Petitioner's retired pay calculated by using the following formula:
                                                            1/2 x a / b x 100 = %
½ x 17/ 20 x 100 = 42.5%
(a representing the number of years of marriage during active duty, and b representing Petitioner’s total years of active duty service).
            In agreeing to this formula, the parties assume that each will be responsible for state and federal income tax on that portion of retired pay he or she receives after the pay is divided.

2.         The respondent’s right to receive her portion of petitioner’s military retired pay shall begin on ______________ by agreement of the parties.  _____________ was the date the parties Dissolution Decree that was signed by the Honorable ________________. (If receiving retired pay benefits at time of the dissolution).  Petitioner is currently receiving payment of his longevity retirement.  .
3.         (This provision benefit the servicing servicmember, as it does not give credit to the spouse for rank earned after the date of the dissolution).  The amount due to the respondent under this order shall be increased each time the Petitioner receives an active duty pay, reserve pay or retired/retainer pay cost of living adjustment (COLA).  The increase shall be the same percentage as the cost of living adjustment the Petitioner receives
4.         It is the Petitioner’s obligation to pay to the respondent the monthly amounts set forth and due her under this provision, and if the finance center, for any reason, does not withhold and pay directly to the respondent the petitioner shall pay to the respondent the difference between the amount she is entitled to receive under this provision and the amount, if any, she receives through direct payment.
6.         ( This paragraph through paragraph 10 are for the benefit of the spouse.  It is intended to prevent the servicemember from taking action post dissolution to reduce benefits to the spouse while increasing a benefit to the servicemember).  It is the intent of the parties that the respondent receives payment equal to ________% of the Petitioner’s gross retired pay each and every month from the date of initiation plus COLA increase as set forth above.
7.         The petitioner shall not take any action which would defeat, reduce, or limit the respondent’s right to receive her share of the petitioner’s military retired or retainer pay benefits, including merging retired pay with other pensions, or waiving any portion of retired or retainer pay in order to receive increased disability pay.  If petitioner does breach this provision, he shall indemnify and pay directly to respondent any sums reduced by such action. 

8.         If Petitioner becomes entitled to Concurrent Retirement & Disability Pay (CRDP[1]) by receiving VA disability payments, Respondent shall have the right to the same percentage of Petitioner’s CRDP benefits as she was awarded from Petitioner’s retired pay benefits as set forth in this Order.
9.         Petitioner agrees not to elect CSB/Redux[2]  which would reduce Respondent’s share of the retired pay. Petitidoner agrees that if he exercises this option, he shall immediately pay, upon receipt, to Respondent a sum equal to the application of Respondent’s percentage share of Petiitioner’s retired pay benefits to the CSB/Redux benefit.  Respondent’s percentage share is as set forth in paragraph 1 above. 
10.       The petitioner agrees to promptly provide any information or documentation the respondent may need to complete a request for direct payment of disposable retired or retainer pay form the appropriate military finance center, addressed as follows:
            Garnishment Operations Directorate
            Code L-S54 2615 (last four digits of service member’s SSN)
Defense Finance and Accounting Services
            Cleveland Center
            P.O. Box 998002
            Cleveland, OH 44199-8002

(put in an envelope certified mail and mark on the envelope, direct payment or survivor benefit)

            11.       The petitioner shall designate the respondent as his beneficiary under the Survivor’s Benefit Plan (SBP).  The petitioner shall elect the spouse-only option, and he shall select as the base amount equal to fifty (50%) of his monthly gross retired or retainer pay.  If retired/retainer pay benefits paid to Respondent are not charged for the cost of SBP benefits she receives under this Order, Respondent shall repay to Petitioner on a monthly basis the cost of Petitioner of this SBP election.  If not voluntarily made each month, payment shall be made within five (5) days of demand by Petitioner and proof of the SBP cost being charged to him or paid by him.
12.         For purposes of this agreement, the term “gross retired/retainer pay” means the monthly retirement benefit the petitioner is entitled to receive, except that monthly Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) costs shall be deducted in calculating “gross retired/retainer pay” if the petitioner has designated the respondent as the SBP beneficiary as required by this agreement.  It includes retired or retainer pay paid or payable due to longevity of active duty and/or reserve service and all payments paid under the provisions of Title 10, Chapter 61, United States Code.  It includes Current Retirement  and Disability pay (CRDP) if received and all amounts of retired or retainer pay” the petitioner in any manner actually or constructively waives or forfeits for any reason or purpose.
13.       The parties hereto certify (i) that they were married to each other ___ years, ( date of marriage – , date of dissolution -  ) during with time the petitioner performed ten (10) years or more of credible service; and, (II)  that at the time of the dissolution the Court had jurisdiction over service member as required by 10 USC § 1408(c)
14.  The parties shall comply with the terms of this order in good faith and shall notify the court and the other party if there are any substantial changes which would impact the retired pay of the Petitioner. Examples of this include the remarriage of Respondent before age 50 (SBP coverage ends) and election by Petitioner of VA disability compensation or Combat-Related Special Compensation, either of which would diminish the available retired pay of Petitioner (thus reducing the share for Respondent).
            15.       That upon issuance of the Court’s judgment and decree incorporating the terms and provisions of this agreement, respondent shall file with the designed agent of the military service an application conforming to the requirements of DD form 2293, (or successor form) Request for Respondent Payments from Retired Pay, or a signed statement giving notice to make direct payments to the respondent from petitioner’s retied/retainer pay, a certified copy of this Order,  a statement that this Order has not been amended, superseded, or set aside, identifying information on petitioner to enable processing of the request, and a statement that the respondent shall agree that any future overpayments are recoverable and subject to involuntary collection from respondent or her estate.
            16.       The petitioner shall cooperate in all acts, supply all documents and information, which will facilitate the designated agent of the uniformed service to approve and process this Order application.
17.       The parties agree that the Court shall retain jurisdiction over the issues raised in this provision indefinitely, so that the terms of this provision can be subject to future modification by the Court upon a showing that the intent of the parties is not being met by future or present events.
            18.       That respondent shall retain all right to garnishment provided for in 32 CFR 63, 5 CFR 581 and 42 USC 659.
            THE RELIEFE HEREIN ORDERED IS EFFECTIVE _____________ THE DATE OF THE PARTIES DISSOLUTION;
SO ORDERED THIS __________ DAY OF ______________, 2006

______________________________________
Judge of District Court


[1] CRDP represents concurrent receipt disability and retirement pay.  When a servicemember receives CRDP he is receiving both retirement and disability compensation.  Prior to 2004, this was forbidden by law.  The law has a ten year phase in period, unless the disability rating is 100%
[2] a bonus of $30,000 paid at or around 15 years of service, the election of which reduces the military pension)



 
Disclaimer: Blogs posted herein are intended neither as legal advice, nor do they create nor attempt to create an attorney-client relationship. The person viewing my blogs is admonished that an attorney-client relationship may only be created with the express consent to the parties to it. This blog is only the opinion of the author and are not expressed authority on any of the subjects discussed